• P-ISSN 2277-3525 E-ISSN 2582-7901

Journal of Multidisciplinary
Dental Research

Article

Journal of Multidisciplinary Dental Research

DOI: 10.38138/JMDR/v7i1.2

Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 17-23

Original Article

Current trends in endodontic practice, adaptation to new technologies and attitude of dental practitioners towards endodontic standards in Sri Lanka

BMCA Bandaranayake ✉ 1, KA Wettasinghe 2, MCN Fonseka 3, RD Jayasinghe 4

1 Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
2 Professor in Restorative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
3 Senior Lecturer, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
4 Chair Professor of Oral Medicine & Periodontology, Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

✉ Corresponding author email: [email protected]
 

Received Date:01 June 2021, Accepted Date:09 June 2021, Published Date:20 June 2021

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Objectives: The study were to describe the current endodontic practices among the dental surgeons in Sri Lanka, and to determine the association between years of practice and choice of endodontic materials and equipment. Materials and Methods: A postal survey was conducted to assess the current trends in endodontic practice, adaptation to new technologies and attitude of dental practitioners towards endodontic standards in Sri Lanka. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20. Results and Discussion: The total response rate was 38.75%.Most of the respondents were females (58.5%), with only a bachelor degree (63.9%) and practicing in the government hospitals (80.4%).The majority preferred to complete endodontic treatment within 3 appointments. Low level of rubber dam use was a striking feature noted. Most of them used manual instruments manipulated with a filing technique. A high percentage (MWP-63.2% PP- 61.3%) used tactile sensation as a method of working length determination and only a few (MWP-21.8% PP-32.8%) used apex locators. The first choice of root canal irrigant was sodium hypochlorite (MWP-76.4% PP-80.4%). The most popular obturation technique was cold lateral condensation in the MWP as 57.7% and 58.3% in the PP. The majority seem to overuse antibiotics.None of the respondents in the PP used endodontic microscopes but 12.3% used intraoral cameras. There was a significant correlation (p<0.05) between using rubber dam in the MWP and using Ni-Ti rotary instruments, using K files, performing step-back technique, using sodium hypochlorite root canal irrigant in the PP, with years of professional activity. Conclusion : The results of this study shows that the standard guidelines and new technologies for endodontic treatment are not implemented by many practitioners of Sri Lanka and the importance of continuing dental education for practitioners to update their knowledge.

Keywords

­ Attitude, Dental Surgeons, Endodontology, Guidelines

References

  1. Ericson HM, Kirkevang LL, Peterson K. Endodontic epidemiology and treatment outcome general considerations. Endodontic topics. 2002;2:1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-1546.2002.20101.x
  2. Edirisooriya E, Wettasinghe KA. Endodontic evolution unveiled. Sri Lanka Dental Journal. 2009;39:6–13.
  3. Chong BS., ed. Harty's Endodontics in Clinical Practice. (Vol. 6, pp. 10-11) 2009.
  4. Iqbal A, Akbar I, Qureshi B, Sghaireen MG, AL-Omiri MK. A Survey of Standard Protocols for Endodontic Treatment in North of KSA. ISRN Dentistry. 2014;2014:1–4. doi: 10.1155/2014/865780
  5. Shrestha D, Dahal M, Karki S. An endodontic practice profile amongst general dental practitioners in Kathmandu: A questionnaire survey. Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal. 2014;9(4):40–50. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v9i4.10235
  6. Vytaure P, Rusmute M, Saulius D, Jurata R. Attitude of general Dental Practitioners towards Endodontic standards and adaption of new technology -A literature review. Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal. 2009;11:11–14. Available from: https://sbdmj.lsmuni.lt/091/091-01.pdf
  7. Undergraduate Curriculum Guidelines for Endodontology. International Endodontic Journal. 2001;34:574–580. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0143-2885.2001.00508.x
  9. Slaus G, Bottenberg P. A survey of endodontic practice amongst Flemish dentists. International Endodontic Journal. 2002;35(9):759–767. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00564.x
  10. Jenkins SM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PMH. A study of endodontic treatment carried out in dental practice within the UK. International Endodontic Journal. 2001;34(1):16–22. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00341.x
  11. Cohen S, Schwartz S. Endodontic complications and the law. Journal of Endodontics. 1987;13(4):191–197. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(87)80139-5
  12. Weiger R, Axmann-Krcmar D, LM C. Prognosis of conventional root canal treatment reconsidered. Dental Traumatology. 1998;14(1):1–9. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1998.tb00801.x
  13. BHW, DLG, BGL, BRl. Current trends in endodontic treatment report of a national survey. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1996;127(9):1333–1341. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0444
  14. Wettasinghe KA, Jayasinghe RD. A Survey on use of radiographs for endodontic treatment in dental practices of Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of medicine. 2003;12(2):41–45.
  15. Bjorndal L, Reit C. The adoption of new endodontic technology amongst Danish general dental practitioners. International Endodontic Journal. 2005;38(1):52–58. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00904.x
  16. Moor RJGD, Hommez GMG, Boever JGD, Delme KIM, Martens GEI. Periapical health related to the quality of root canal treatment in a Belgian population. International Endodontic Journal. 2000;33(2):113–120. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00295.x
  17. Singh S, Podar R, Dadu S, Kulkarni G, Kohli A. A comparative evaluation of endodontic practice trends in India: "The Mumbai study" Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2014;25(6):729. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.152179
  18. Jafarzadeh H, Udoye CI, Sede MA, Abbott PV. A Survey of Endodontic Practices among Dentists in Nigeria. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2013;14(2):293–298. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1316
  19. Mensudar R, AJ, Sukumarai AG. Evaluation of current trends in Endodontic treatment procedure among dental practitioners. International Journal of Dental and Health sciences. 2014;1(6):861–868.
  20. Cook JV, Dickinson HO, Eccles MP. Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: An observational study. BMC Health Services Research. 2009;9(1):160. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-160
  21. Al-Nahlawi T, Doumani M, Alalo HA, Habib A. Dentists’ Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Root Canal Treatment Procedure: Survey-based Research. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2019;20(3):347–354. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2521
  22. Markvart M, Fransson H, Endoreco, Bjorndal L. Ten-year follow up on adaptation of endodontic technology and clinical guidelines amongst Danish dental practitioners. ActaOdontlScand. 2018;76(7):515–519.
  23. Kumar S, Sengupta J. Endodontic treatment for mandibular molars using ProTaper. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2011;67:377–379. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0377-1237(11)60091-9
  25. Malmberg L, Hagg E, Bjorkner AE. Endodontic infection control routines among general dental practitioners in Sweden and Norway: A questionnaire Survey. Acta Odontol Scandinavia. 2019;77(6):434–438. Available from: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1584330
  26. Kawashima N, Wadachi R, Suda H. Root canal medicaments. Int Dent J. 2009;59(1):5–11.
  27. Qualtrough AJE, Whitworth JM, Dummer PMH. Preclinical endodontology: an international comparison. International Endodontic Journal. 1999;32(5):406–414. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00253.x
  30. Thalha MS, Wali A, Anwar A. Attitude, techniques and trends in endodontic treatment by the house surgeons in dental institutes - Karachi. Int J of Con Den and Med Reviews. 2015;p. 6.
  31. Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;87(3):256–263. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.122014
  32. Low JF, Dom TNM, Baharin SA. Magnification in endodontics: A review of its application and acceptance among dental practitioners. European Journal of Dentistry. 2018;12(04):610–616. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_248_18
  33. Savani GM, Sabbah W, Sedgley CM, Whitten B. Current Trends in Endodontic Treatment by General Dental Practitioners: Report of a United States National Survey. Journal of Endodontics. 2014;40(5):618–624. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.029

COPYRIGHT

© 2021 Published by International Dental Educationists’ Association (IDEA). This is an open-access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

  • 20 June 2021
  • VIEWS 2118
  • PDF 399
Article Metrics


More articles

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles, news.