• P-ISSN 2277-3525 E-ISSN 2582-7901

Journal of Multidisciplinary
Dental Research

Article

Journal of Multidisciplinary Dental Research

DOI: 10.38138/JMDR/v10i2.18

Volume: 10, Issue: 2, Pages: 68-73

Review Article

Methods for Assessing Orthodontic Mini Implant Stability

Suhaila Zainal Abidin1, Maryati Md Dasor1,∗

1Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh Campus, Selangor, Malaysia

*Corresponding Author
Email: [email protected]

Received Date:12 August 2024, Accepted Date:09 October 2024, Published Date:17 December 2024

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Assessing the stability of orthodontic mini implants (MI) is critical for ensuring successful treatment outcomes. This abstract reviews, various methods employed to measure MI stability in orthodontics. Invasive methods include histologic & histomorphometry technique, cutting torque resistance analysis, removal torque analysis and insertion torque analysis. Non-invasive modalities such as surgeon’s perception, radiographic examination, finite element analysis, percussion test, pulsed oscillation waveform, Periotest and Resonance Frequency Analysis. Each method contributes uniquely to the assessment of MI stability, aiding orthodontists in making informed decisions regarding treatment planning and anchorage management. Understanding the strengths and limitations of these measurement methods enhances their clinical utility and ensures optimal treatment outcomes in orthodontic practice.

Keywords: Orthodontic mini implants, Stability measurement, Orthodontics

References

  1. Schätzle M, Männchen R, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2009;20(12):1351–1359. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01754.x
  2. Lee TCK, McGrath CPJ, Wong RWK, Rabie ABM. Patients’ perceptions regarding microimplant as anchorage in orthodontics. Angle Orthodontist. 2008;78(2):228–233. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2319/040507-172.1
  3. Zawawi KH. Acceptance of orthodontic miniscrews as temporary anchorage devices. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:933–937. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s66133
  4. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2003;124(4):373–378. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00565-1
  5. Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, Hartsfield JK, Roberts WE, Garetto LP. The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage. Journal of Dental Research. 2003;82(5):377–381. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200510
  6. Chen Y, Kyung HM, Zhao WT, Yu WJ. Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2009;135(3):284–291. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.017
  7. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clinical Materials. 1992;10(3):153–201. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-y
  8. Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1998;11(5):408–420. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9922733/
  9. Fontes J, Martin VZ, Resende M, Colaço B, De SGP, Amarante JM. Effect of Splinting on Orthodontic Mini-Implant Tipping and Bone Histomorphometric Parameters: An In Vivo Animal Model Study. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2023;14(5):1–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14050239
  10. Luzi C, Verna C, Melsen B. Immediate loading of orthodontic mini-implants: a histomorphometric evaluation of tissue reaction. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;31(1):21–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn087
  11. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Johansson P, Strid CG, Lekholm U. Evaluation of bone density using cutting resistance measurements and microradiography: an in vitro study in pig ribs. Clinical Oral Implants Research . 1995;6(3):164–171. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060305.x
  12. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Lekholm U. Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. A pilot study in jaw autopsy specimens. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1995;6(4):213–219. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060403.x
  13. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Gröndahl K, Bergström C, Bäck T, Lekholm U. On cutting torque measurements during implant placement: a 3-year clinical prospective study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 1999;1(2):75–83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00095.x
  14. Wilmes B, Su YY, Sadigh L, Drescher D. Pre-drilling force and insertion torques during orthodontic mini-implant insertion in relation to root contact. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics. 2008;69(1):51–58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-008-0726-5
  15. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1984;86(2):95–111. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90301-4
  16. Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1991;2(1):24–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020103.x
  17. Suzuki EY, Suzuki B. Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2011;139(5):669–678. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.11.017
  18. Favero LG, Pisoni A, Paganelli C. Removal torque of osseointegrated mini-implants: an in vivo evaluation. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2007;29(5):443–448. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm062
  19. Lim SA, Cha JY, Hwang CJ. Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length. Angle Orthodontist. 2008;78(2):234–240. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2319/121206-507.1
  24. Salmória KK, Tanaka OM, Guariza-Filho O, Camargo ES, Souza LTd, Maruo H. Insertional torque and axial pull-out strength of mini-implants in mandibles of dogs. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2008;133(6):e15–e22. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.020
  25. Leung MTC, Rabie ABM, Wong RWK. Stability of connected mini-implants and miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008;30(5):483–489. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm124
  26. Tarigan SHP, Sufarnap E, Bahirrah S. The Orthodontic Mini-Implants Failures Based on Patient Outcomes: Systematic Review. European Journal of Dentistry. 2024;18(02):417–429. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772249
  27. Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2007;22(5):743–754. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17974108/
  28. Dias LCS, Ferreira YBdC, Tavarez RRdJ, Pinzan-Vercelino CRM, Gurgel JdA. Reliability and accuracy of a radiographic analysis method for posterior maxillary mini-implant location. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2012;20(1):99–103. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572012000100018
  29. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Nummikoski PV, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2001;16(4):475–485. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11515994/
  30. Schnelle MA, Beck FM, Jaynes RM, Huja SS. A radiographic evaluation of the availability of bone for placement of miniscrews. Angle Orthodontist. 2004;74(6):832–837. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074%3C0832:areota%3E2.0.co;2
  31. Kalra S, Tripathi T, Rai P, Kanase A. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study. Progress in Orthodontics. 2014;15(1):1–9. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0061-x
  32. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1998;11(5):491–501. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9922740/
  33. Sarika K, Kumaran NK, Seralathan S, Sathishkumar RK, Preethi SK. A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Around the Bone Mini-Implant Interface Based on the Mini-Implant Angle of Insertion, Diameter, and Length. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2023;15(Suppl 1):S535–S544. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_524_22
  36. Schulte W, Hoedt B, Lukas D, Maunz M, Steppeler M. Periotest for measuring periodontal characteristics--correlation with periodontal bone loss. Journal of Periodontal Research. 1992;27(3):184–190. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1992.tb01667.x
  37. Seifi M, Matini NS. Evaluation of primary stability of innovated orthodontic miniscrew system (STS): An ex-vivo study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2016;8(3):e255–e259. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4930633/
  38. Valderrama P, Oates TW, Jones AA, Simpson J, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability: a clinical trial. Journal of Periodontology. 2007;78(2):262–272. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060143
  39. Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Panayotidis A, Pauls A, Golubovic V, Schwarz F, et al. Measurement of mini-implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. Angle Orthodontist. 2013;83(2):230–238. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2319/043012-354.1
  40. Park JH. Temporary anchorage devices in clinical orthodontics. (pp. xxvii, 1-775) John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. 2020.
  41. Lachmann S, Laval JY, Jäger B, Axmann D, Gomez-Roman G, Groten M. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2006;17(1):80–84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01174.x
  42. Hosein YK, Dixon SJ, Rizkalla AS, Tassi A. A novel technique for measurement of orthodontic mini-implant stability using the Osstell ISQ device. Angle Orthodontics. 2018;89(2):284–291. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2319/011518-46.1
  43. Dhaliwal JS, Albuquerque RF, Fakhry A, Kaur S, Feine JS. Customized SmartPeg for measurement of resonance frequency of mini dental implants. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2017;3(1):1–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0066-6

COPYRIGHT

© 2024 Published by International Dental Educationists’ Association (IDEA). This is an open-access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 

  • 19 January 2025
  • VIEWS 8
  • PDF 3
Article Metrics


More articles

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles, news.