Journal of Multidisciplinary
Dental Research

Introduction

Dental implant therapy has become the current and future trend for replacement of missing teeth. However, the biggest challenge faced by implant dentistry is excessive alveolar ridge resorption following extraction of teeth. In dental clinical practice, deficiency of bone height/width, volume is one of the prime reasons for evading implant therapy.

In order to make the alveolar ridge adequate for implant placement, it is essential to re-establish the ridge dimension favourably. This could be achieved using bone-grafting materials. Augmenting the alveolar ridge is the process of appending bone in anatomically and/or functionally deficient regions. The purpose of the grafted material is to provide stability and support for the future dental implant. As the innate bone grows, it substitutes the grafted material and eventually results in an amalgamated region of new bone.1

Regardless of the recent advances in bone grafts and bone-substitutes, intramembranous autogenous bone grafts harvested from intra-oral or extra-oral sites are deemed as the gold-standards for alveolar ridge reconstruction.2 If the quantity of bone needed for augmentation is moderate, grafts can be procured from intra-oral regional sites such as maxillary tuberosity, mandibular symphysis, mandibular ramus, angle of mandible and any exostoses.

Block grafts obtained from mandibular symphysis can be used predictably for ridge augmentation up to 6 mm in horizontal and vertical dimension.1 The bone quality usually found in this region is D-1 or D-2 and grafts for augmenting up to three teeth edentulous areas can be obtained from the chin region. Pikos M in 2000 conducted a study assessing the efficiency of block grafts in restoring the ridge defects. Amongst 115 autogenous block grafting, only one complete failure was noted and other cases showed predictable clinical outcome.3

Furthermore, the use of piezosurgery in periodontal and implant therapy simplifies and improves handling of soft and hard tissues. However, the introduction of piezosurgery has enabled the manual instrumentation limits to be pushed, and this makes the procedure a simpler and more reliable technique. The key benefits of the piezoelectric instrument are precise cut on hard tissues and its ability to cause minimal tissue damage ensuing better healing.4, 5

Thus, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the amount of horizontal and vertical bone gain achieved by ridge augmentation procedure with autogenous bone graft procured from mandibular symphysis region using piezosurgery unit.

Materials and methods

Study sample

A total number of ten patients who reported with chief complaint of missing upper teeth with Sibert’s Class III ridge defect6 were included in the study (Figure 1). Institutional ethical committee approval was secured before initiating the study. The patients were explained about the methodology of the study and informed consents were obtained. All the patients were assessed for any relevant medical history and 10 systemically healthy patients (6 male and 4 female) aged between 20 and 50 years were preferred for the study. The patients with Class I and II ridge defects, oral abusive habits such as smoking, pan chewing, pregnant women and lactating mothers were excluded from the study.

Pre-operative examination encompassed clinical and radiographic examination of the donor and the implant recipient site. Clinically, ridge mapping was done to assess the existing ridge width and height in the recipient site. This was further confirmed by analysing the pre-clinical models. The baseline horizontal ridge width and vertical ridge height values are 3.21±0.24 mm and 6.18±0.32 mm respectively. The donor site was examined for ridge morphology, vestibular depth, and width of keratinized tissue and thickness of attached gingiva. Intra-oral periapical radiographs (IOPAR) and Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) analysis of both the recipient and the donor site was carried out. This enabled in knowing the quantity of bone required for the recipient site and quality as well as quantity of bone available in the donor site.

Surgical procedure

Following the preparation of the surgical area and setting up the armamentarium, the recipient sites were anesthetized using 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with 1:100000 adrenaline. The edentulous site requires initial mid-crestal incision that continues into the sulcus as sulcular incision on either side of the defect. Bilateral vertical releasing incisions are given and full thickness mucoperiosteal flap is reflected (Figure 2). The sites were further prepared by performing decortication using a 702L straight fissure bone cutting bur.

The donor site was anesthetised by bilateral mandibular block, mental nerve block and infiltration in the midline at the base of the mental protuberance. Mucoperiosteal flap was reflected using sulcular approach. The lateral extent of graft to be harvested was marked using osteotomy 7 piezosurgery tip (OT7) (Figure 3). For block harvesting from the symphysis, guidelines proposed by Pommer et al. in 2008 7 to curtail neurosensory injury. After amputating the graft from the surrounding bone, it is stored in saline until it is transplanted into the recipient site. The area is then filled with collagen sponges, particulate alloplastic bone graft and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) membrane (Figure 4). The flap is then re-approximated and sutured with simple interrupted sutures.

The autogenous block chin graft is then placed in the recipient site and secured using two titanium screws to prevent micro-rotation of the graft. Autogenous particulate bone graft procured from the donor site was mixed with alloplastic particulate bone graft material and then packed surrounding the block graft (Figure 5). The recipient site was then covered by a GTR membrane and the mucoperiosteal flap was slightly coronally advanced and sutured using 4-0 silk suture material (Figure 6).

All the patients were given post-operative instructions and were prescribed with analgesics (Ibuprofen 400 mg BID for 3 days), antibiotics (Amoxicillin with clavulanic acid; 500 mg+625 mg TID for 5 days) and chlorhexidine digluconate (0.2% BID for two weeks) for chemical plaque control. Suture removal was done around 14 days post-operatively. The patients were recalled after 6 months to re-assess the ridges clinically and radiographically for surgical re-entry and implant placement.

At the 6 months follow-up, surgical re-entry was done with flap outline similar to the first surgery. Subsequent to mucoperiosteal flap elevation, the healed crest width and height were measured and recorded. The fixation screws that held the bone blocks were removed, and implant insertion was performed according to standard surgical protocols (Figure 7, Figure 8). The implants were then restored after a healing period of 4-6 months (Figure 9).

Statistical analysis

All the data of the clinical parameters assessed were first probed descriptively and were articulated as median and mean values. Statistical significance for the clinical parameters at baseline and at 6 months follow-up period was determined by the nonparametric ANOVA test using the Brunner-Langer model for longitudinal data. P value of less than 0.05 (P≤0.05) was regarded statistically significant. All statistical analyses were computed using SPSS software version 18.

Results

Out of 10 patients, 8 patients did not report any significant adverse effect at the donor site. 2 patients had postoperative discomforts that included swelling and pain for the first week. However, they did not require specific additional treatment. The recipient site in 9 out of 10 patients showed uneventful healing, whereas one patient developed hematoma for which antibiotic therapy was extended for 2 more days. Clinical parameters recorded at baseline and at 6 months follow-up showed that the gain in horizontal ridge width was 6.11±0.54 mm and the gain in vertical ridge height was 9.72± 0.98 mm. The clinical parameters showed statistically significant improvement from baseline to post-operative 6 months with P value ≤0.05 (Table 1).

The level of statistical significance was set at P≤0.05 and statistical analysis was done by repeated measures ANOVA.

Discussion

Once a natural tooth is lost, there will be inevitable resorption of alveolar ridge that may jeopardise the aesthetics and alter the function of adjacent teeth. When pondering the treatment options for replacement of teeth missing from the anterior region of both maxilla and mandible, the main objective is always to provide a functional restoration that is synchronous with rest of the natural dentition.

When the remaining bone level is not adequate for immediate replacement of the missing teeth, bone augmentation procedures are employed. In order to attain bone regeneration, the principles of osteogenesis, osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osteostimulation can be applied to heighten the therapeutic methodologies. 8

Seibert JS in 1983 gave the ridge defect classification where class I defect has bucco-lingual loss of alveolar bone resulting in reduced ridge width with normal ridge height, class II defect has reduced bone height with apico-coronal loss of bone and normal ridge width, class III defect shows combination of both reduced ridge height and width with loss of bone apico-coronally and bucco-lingually. 6

Class III defects were chosen for the present study as it is challenging to achieve bone regeneration in both horizontal and vertical directions. Autogenous block bone grafts in combination with particulate autogenous grafts, alloplast and GTR has provided promising results. 9 Symphysis region was chosen as the donor site as it is formed by intramembranous bone formation with D-1 or D-2 type of bone and provides easier access to procure the graft than other intra-oral donor sites. 10, 11 Moreover, autogenous grafts are the only grafts that aids in new bone formation by promoting osteogenesis and osteoinduction in the recipient site. Therefore, they are regarded as the ‘gold standard, for increasing the bone volume and enable implant placement. 12 Hence, in the present study, autogenous block bone graft from mandibular symphyseal region in combination with particulate autograft, alloplast and GTR membrane was employed.

Chappuis in 2016 evaluated the lateral ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and guided bone regeneration (GBR) and followed up the cases for a period 10 years. The results demonstrated that lateral ridge augmentation using block bone grafts and GBR demonstrated a high success rate of 98.1% with minimal graft resorption noted at 10 years. 9 Proussaefs in 2005 used intra-orally harvested autogenous block grafts for vertical ridge augmentation in 12 patients. The study concluded that mandibular block autogenous bone grafts can maintain their vitality when used for vertical ridge augmentation and provide promising outcome in terms of gain in ridge height. 13 This is in accordance with the present study where statistically significant gain in alveolar ridge height and width were noted at the 6 months follow-up.

In the donor site, sulcular incision approach can be used safely if there is no periodontal disease and no crowns are present in the anterior teeth, thickness of the attached gingiva and depth of the vestibule are adequate. Through this approach, it is easier to access the symphysis region up to the maximum extent as per the guideline and also for obtaining additional bone blocks and scrapings. 10

Piezo-electric surgery was chosen as it provides micro-precision, selective cutting ability, maximum visibility and excellent healing. Healing is enhanced by utilizing ultrasound to create micropits at the base of the defect to trigger cellular response of healing mechanisms. Furthermore, it decreases the invasiveness of conventional osseous surgery by hastening the procedure. It also encourages tissue healing by using the bone removed during the osteoplasty procedure to graft the osseous defects. 14 So peizo-electric unit was utilized in the present study to procure the autogenous bone graft from the donor site and to perform decortication in the recipient site.

Recipient site preparation was carried out as it is crucial for predictable incorporation of block bone graft. In order to achieve this, decortication and perforation the marrow spaces is done as it quickens re-vascularization. This will lead to two to ten times faster healing than the physiological healing. 15

The common post-operative complications that occur following graft harvesting from the symphyseal region is pain, donor site exposure, chin ptosis, hematoma and lingual space infection in severe cases. 10 Apart from post-operative pain, swelling and hematoma formation in 3 patients, no other severe complications were encountered. The 3 patients who presented with the above mentioned discomforts did not require additional treatment as the symptoms subsided within the next three to four days.

Conclusion

The results of the present interventional study suggest that horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation of class III ridge defects can be successfully achieved with autogenous block bone graft from chin. The additional use of piezo-electric surgery, particulate bone graft materials and GTR membranes ensure the predictable outcome of the augmentation procedure. Dental implants can be appended six months after surgical placement of the grafting materials.Acknowledgement: NilConflict of interest: Nil